This weekend before the train ride to Poughkeepsie to see my fiance, I purchased this month’s issue of Brides magazine. I prefer Brides to many of the other magazines available, for several reasons. They seem to have some of the most valuable information available, and they don’t assume you come from either a particularly affluent or modest background. It’s filled with great tips for bouquets, wedding colors, favors, hair styles, workout and makeup tips, and sometimes the occasional money (or time) saver. They often include one-pagers that compare ritzy and generic, letting the reader decide which they prefer and what they can skimp (or save!) on. I’m usually quite impressed with the selection of articles and the content. Sometime, remind me to compare all the bridal magazines out there, giving pros and cons for those of you without the time.
Anyway, this month, there was just such a money saving article called “Real Brides Talk Budget”. Unfortunately, it disappointed.
Brides interviewed a panel of women who were either getting married or are already married and asked them what they did to save money. They had some good tips, like where to save money (favors), how the financial market has affected planning and how to fix it, and who pays. There was one question, though, that asked whether the brides worried that some cost-cutting strategies would make them look cheap to guests.
First of all, to that, I say , “WHO CARES?” Seriously. You, in some capacity, are the ones paying for it. And you had the kindness to even invite the guest at all. So honestly, your guests should NEVER feel like you’re cheap. It’s your wedding, your celebration, and if you’re being cheap (or savvy) that’s your prerogative. Granted, there are some things I would never recommend skimping on, but if you don’t want real flowers in your wedding because they cost too much, that’s totally your call.
And if you don’t want to serve your guests a full dinner at the reception, you don’t have to do that either. Or provide alcohol. A reception is just like any other party, except you just got married, so you’re probably (hopefully) more thrilled than usual. Other than that, whether or not you want to provide guests with their every dream and fantasy is up to YOU, and you alone. If your guests don’t like it, tough, they can leave. I just don’t understand the mentality, especially in an article about saving during tough financial times, of worrying about what your guests think. If they’re that tacky, don’t invite them, instead of trying to accommodate them at the expense of your checkbook. To feed 150 guests a great meal for one night, that they’ll talk about only for the evening and then forget, you could be paying a credit card bill for months. Not fair, I say! (Well, you do get the gifts, so they should get some sort of return on investment, but no one was pulling their arms.)
Let me use an example I’ve been struggling with to illustrate. When we first started planning my wedding, I wanted to do the whole cute hors d’oeuvres thing for food, offering sandwiches, and tea, and treats, etc. Actually, ORIGINALLY I had wanted to serve a full meal, but that very quickly became clear that it wouldn’t fit into the $5000 dollar budget my parents set. The wedding will be in Iowa, and my fiance and I are also contributing, so the whole budget will probably wind up around $10,000, but compared to many weddings nowadays, that’s pocket change.
Anyway, my mother was not in favor of the catered sandwiches idea, but decided that we could “CATER” THE WHOLE THING OURSELVES. I really didn’t think that was going to happen, but I’ve never been married before, so she has no idea what she’s getting into. We had gone back and forth on what to do until about two weeks ago, when my mom hosted my younger brother’s graduation party. She realized after trying to feed only a fraction of the people who would be at the wedding, for an event where she didn’t really have to be involved, and for which she had days to plan and nothing else to do (no flowers, dress, parties, etc.), that it would be impossible to cater my wedding without professional help. As I had said.
One of the arguments that had been going back and forth between us was whether you could just serve the guests cake and nuts and snacks and call it a day. I said absolutely no way, she said of course. Keep in mind, it’s an early afternoon wedding, and the reception is after lunch but before dinner. Then, after the graduation party, my soon-to-be-mother-in-law visited. We talked about the wedding, and she also thought it was completely unnecessary to serve food. I believed her (and not my mother, for some reason.. . mothers) so we all collaborated and decided on a very simple menu:
- Wedding cake in about 5 flavors (note: my fiance is getting a degree in baking and pastry arts at CIA, and is making the cake, then we’re ordering sheet cake in several flavors)
- Mixed Nuts
- Cream Cheese Mints
- Chocolate-covered strawberries
- Cheese tray w/ crackers
- Fruit tray
- Trail mix/ snack mix
- Good coffee, iced tea, fountain punch
- Champagne/wine for toasting only
So, in the end, unless I change my mind again, which could happen, I’m only providing snacks and cake for my guests between lunch and dinner. There will also be a huge candy bar for the favors, instead of handing out individual favors at place settings. I think it’s a fairly classy way to handle the situation and save money, and I truly hope no one will complain. Now, back to the article.
The brides mention that they’ve been to weddings without alcohol, and they weren’t “cheap or tacky–but with no alcohol they were kind of boring.” I can understand that. However, alcohol doesn’t fit all circumstances. Is it really bad not to provide alcohol for people at three in the afternoon? Then, one girl said it was tacky to have a cash bar. Seriously. No alcohol is boring, but if you can’t afford it, it’s too tacky to have a cash bar. I just don’t agree with that. I know there are many who would agree–but what could be so bad about it? You help control people’s drinking, and you aren’t stuck with a huge alcohol bill at the end of the night. Maybe that is tacky, but it’s true.
They give good tips that I do agree with–if you can’t afford a band or a DJ, load your MP3 player with a wedding playlist, hook it up to some good speakers (even those are less than a DJ), and let it go. Might need someone to man it, but you certainly save. They also really suggest bargaining in this peice, and if you’re in a position to do so, I encourage it. Might seem a little scary, but it is a business transaction, and it’s worth it in the end. Also, if you have to spend more on the wedding, you can try doing what one girl calls “lifestyle budgeting” and change some of the daily expenses you have to save for the wedding. Not a bad idea. They wrap it up by saying that while it seems like a lot of money, it’s worth it in the end if you enjoy yourselves. To that I say, yes, just make sure you’ll be enjoying yourselves after the wedding, and not a $20,000 invoice.